http://www.andreasen.org/bartle/
I'm an SAE (socializer achiever explorer)
Mud Personality Test
Mud Personality Test
We did this a couple of years ago on the egroup, but a lot of people here weren't in the egroup, so if yall are interested, here it is again
http://www.andreasen.org/bartle/
I'm an SAE (socializer achiever explorer)
http://www.andreasen.org/bartle/
I'm an SAE (socializer achiever explorer)
-
kiryan
- Sojourner
- Posts: 7275
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2001 5:01 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA and Flagstaff, AZ
- Contact:
Im a AKE. I didnt get my first results copied they were somthing like 86 40 40 33, so I did it again and got 93, 46, 40, 20, and a third time and got 100, 40, 40, 20. guess im not much of a socializer heh. Pretty sad since i dont even blip on the sojourn achievement scale. And mine said something like 4% too. what gives how can we all be so rare? Who comprised a high percentage of the population?
Did the kersey one too im a Rational (NT). What does the NT stand for???
oh yea and jaznolg go take the test again!! i think the results were bunk. youze a killer if i ever saw one! Jaznolg "can i tag the drow mage" Chaos of sorcere
[This message has been edited by kiryan (edited 10-04-2001).]
Did the kersey one too im a Rational (NT). What does the NT stand for???
oh yea and jaznolg go take the test again!! i think the results were bunk. youze a killer if i ever saw one! Jaznolg "can i tag the drow mage" Chaos of sorcere
[This message has been edited by kiryan (edited 10-04-2001).]
-
Galok Icewolf
- Sojourner
- Posts: 510
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2001 6:01 am
-
ShaylaRose
- Sojourner
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2001 5:01 am
- Location: OR, USA
-
Sangdraxus Blackfire
- Sojourner
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2001 5:01 am
- Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Well i don't think the test is that bad.
Pretty much show what kind of players play the muds.
Like here. Most appears to get either social or achieving (eq greed.. hehe), or exploring high.
While on duris, they get killers and achievers. (Greed and pk) Duris in a nutshell.
I think the numbers (in average) are somewhat correct.
Pretty much show what kind of players play the muds.
Like here. Most appears to get either social or achieving (eq greed.. hehe), or exploring high.
While on duris, they get killers and achievers. (Greed and pk) Duris in a nutshell.
I think the numbers (in average) are somewhat correct.
Thanks for taking the test. You are person number 82398 to take it.
Your type is: SEA. 12% of respondents so far fall into that type.
The numbers below represent percentage of how many times you selected a given suite when given the chance. Since there are 15 questions for each suite out of 30 total, the number will add up to 200%. 50% thus means average for each suite, and 100% is the maximum score.
Your answers were split as follows: Socializer 93%
Explorer 46%
Achiever 33%
Killer 26%
Jeez.
Dornax
Jurdex
Your type is: SEA. 12% of respondents so far fall into that type.
The numbers below represent percentage of how many times you selected a given suite when given the chance. Since there are 15 questions for each suite out of 30 total, the number will add up to 200%. 50% thus means average for each suite, and 100% is the maximum score.
Your answers were split as follows: Socializer 93%
Explorer 46%
Achiever 33%
Killer 26%
Jeez.
Dornax
Jurdex
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR><font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by kiryan:
<B>Im a AKE. I didnt get my first results copied they were somthing like 86 40 40 33, so I did it again and got 93, 46, 40, 20, and a third time and got 100, 40, 40, 20. guess im not much of a socializer heh. Pretty sad since i dont even blip on the sojourn achievement scale. And mine said something like 4% too. what gives how can we all be so rare? Who comprised a high percentage of the population?
Did the kersey one too im a Rational (NT). What does the NT stand for???
oh yea and jaznolg go take the test again!! i think the results were bunk. youze a killer if i ever saw one! Jaznolg "can i tag the drow mage" Chaos of sorcere
[This message has been edited by kiryan (edited 10-04-2001).]</B></font><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Hey Kiryan
Here's the breakdown of all types:
1. SEA 12% (10669)
2. ESA 11% (9343)
3. EAS 9% (7857)
4. KAE 6% (5086)
5. KAS 5% (4301)
6. AES 4% (3969)
7. AKE 4% (3729)
8. ESK 4% (3352)
9. ASE 3% (3263)
10. SEK 3% (3192)
11. KEA 3% (2994)
12. SAE 3% (2882)
13. ASK 3% (2651)
14. AKS 3% (2632)
15. EAK 2% (2423)
16. AEK 2% (2036)
17. SKE 2% (2034)
18. KSE 2% (1875)
19. KES 2% (1666)
20. EKA 1% (1523)
21. KSA 1% (1355)
22. SAK 1% (1306)
23. EKS 1% (1234)
24. SKA 1% (1145)
As far as NT, the N stands for Intuitive (as opposed to Sensing) and the T stands for Thinking (as opposed to feeling). Of course everyone has both intuitions and senses, and thoughts and feelings, it just indicates which you pay more attention to.
I could go into this in mind numbing detail as it was my main area of interest when I was getting my Masters, but I think I will spare you
,
<B>Im a AKE. I didnt get my first results copied they were somthing like 86 40 40 33, so I did it again and got 93, 46, 40, 20, and a third time and got 100, 40, 40, 20. guess im not much of a socializer heh. Pretty sad since i dont even blip on the sojourn achievement scale. And mine said something like 4% too. what gives how can we all be so rare? Who comprised a high percentage of the population?
Did the kersey one too im a Rational (NT). What does the NT stand for???
oh yea and jaznolg go take the test again!! i think the results were bunk. youze a killer if i ever saw one! Jaznolg "can i tag the drow mage" Chaos of sorcere
[This message has been edited by kiryan (edited 10-04-2001).]</B></font><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Hey Kiryan
Here's the breakdown of all types:
1. SEA 12% (10669)
2. ESA 11% (9343)
3. EAS 9% (7857)
4. KAE 6% (5086)
5. KAS 5% (4301)
6. AES 4% (3969)
7. AKE 4% (3729)
8. ESK 4% (3352)
9. ASE 3% (3263)
10. SEK 3% (3192)
11. KEA 3% (2994)
12. SAE 3% (2882)
13. ASK 3% (2651)
14. AKS 3% (2632)
15. EAK 2% (2423)
16. AEK 2% (2036)
17. SKE 2% (2034)
18. KSE 2% (1875)
19. KES 2% (1666)
20. EKA 1% (1523)
21. KSA 1% (1355)
22. SAK 1% (1306)
23. EKS 1% (1234)
24. SKA 1% (1145)
As far as NT, the N stands for Intuitive (as opposed to Sensing) and the T stands for Thinking (as opposed to feeling). Of course everyone has both intuitions and senses, and thoughts and feelings, it just indicates which you pay more attention to.
I could go into this in mind numbing detail as it was my main area of interest when I was getting my Masters, but I think I will spare you
,Snicker, make this mud PK!!!!
Your type is: KAS. 5% of respondents so far fall into that type.
The numbers below represent percentage of how many times you selected a given suite when given the chance. Since there are 15 questions for each suite out of 30 total, the number will add up to 200%. 50% thus means average for each suite, and 100% is the maximum score.
Your answers were split as follows:
Killer 100%
Achiever 46%
Socializer 33%
Explorer 20%
Your type is: KAS. 5% of respondents so far fall into that type.
The numbers below represent percentage of how many times you selected a given suite when given the chance. Since there are 15 questions for each suite out of 30 total, the number will add up to 200%. 50% thus means average for each suite, and 100% is the maximum score.
Your answers were split as follows:
Killer 100%
Achiever 46%
Socializer 33%
Explorer 20%
-
Gindipple
- Sojourner
- Posts: 676
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2001 6:01 am
- Location: O' Fallon, MO. USA
- Contact:
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR><font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Vylare:
As far as NT, the N stands for Intuitive (as opposed to Sensing) and the T stands for Thinking (as opposed to feeling). Of course everyone has both intuitions and senses, and thoughts and feelings, it just indicates which you pay more attention to.
I could go into this in mind numbing detail as it was my main area of interest when I was getting my Masters, but I think I will spare you,[/B]</font><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Not sure who this Kersey guy is but I took a similar test in college called the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator test. That sounds like what you are describing.
I was ENTP if I remember right, it was the Inventor type.
I felt it was very accurate too when I read the descriptions of all types.
As far as NT, the N stands for Intuitive (as opposed to Sensing) and the T stands for Thinking (as opposed to feeling). Of course everyone has both intuitions and senses, and thoughts and feelings, it just indicates which you pay more attention to.
I could go into this in mind numbing detail as it was my main area of interest when I was getting my Masters, but I think I will spare you
,[/B]</font><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Not sure who this Kersey guy is but I took a similar test in college called the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator test. That sounds like what you are describing.
I was ENTP if I remember right, it was the Inventor type.
I felt it was very accurate too when I read the descriptions of all types.
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR><font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Vylare:
<B> As far as NT, the N stands for Intuitive (as opposed to Sensing) and the T stands for Thinking (as opposed to feeling). Of course everyone has both intuitions and senses, and thoughts and feelings, it just indicates which you pay more attention to.
I could go into this in mind numbing detail as it was my main area of interest when I was getting my Masters, but I think I will spare you,</B></font><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I took the Keirsey and found myself an Idealist (NF). I absolutely love mind numbing detail and psychology...any idea where to look for that info (without paying the Keirsey people a lotta money for a complete summary)?
-Nikelon
<B> As far as NT, the N stands for Intuitive (as opposed to Sensing) and the T stands for Thinking (as opposed to feeling). Of course everyone has both intuitions and senses, and thoughts and feelings, it just indicates which you pay more attention to.
I could go into this in mind numbing detail as it was my main area of interest when I was getting my Masters, but I think I will spare you
,</B></font><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>I took the Keirsey and found myself an Idealist (NF). I absolutely love mind numbing detail and psychology...any idea where to look for that info (without paying the Keirsey people a lotta money for a complete summary)?
-Nikelon
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR><font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Nikelon:
<B> I took the Keirsey and found myself an Idealist (NF). I absolutely love mind numbing detail and psychology...any idea where to look for that info (without paying the Keirsey people a lotta money for a complete summary)?
-Nikelon
</B></font><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Boy, will you be sorry you asked
OK...Idealists can be INFPs, ENFPs, INFJs, ENFJs. Link to a description of these types:
http://keirsey.com/personality/nf.html
I'm an INFP myself
You used to be able to get your complete Keirsey results online; I see they are now charging. You can probably get their book - Please Understand Me or Please Understand Me II-at the local library. It will have a whole test in it, but you'll have to score it yourself
The alt.psychology.personality archives has a ton of good info:
http://www.ibiblio.org/personality/
There are two tests that have the exact same 16 personality types as results, but they are not the same test.
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI to its friends) is trademarked and copyrighted by Consulting Psychological Press. I'm not aware of anywhere you can take the actual test for free, but there is one in the same style at http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes1.htm These are longer than the Keirsey Temperament Sorter, which is trademarked and copyrighted by David Keirsey. There is a .75 correlation between the two tests, meaning that 3 of 4 people who take both tests will have the same result on both.
These tests are based on Jungian personality theory, and I'm a Jungian kinda gal, so here's a link to Carl Jung's work: http://www.cgjungpage.org/
I'm also endlessly fascinated by the Journal of Mud Research: http://www.brandeis.edu/pubs/jove/
And one of its famous contributors, Richard Bartle, who wrote the article, Players Who Suit Muds, which caused Erwin Andreasen to create the mud personality test.
http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.htm
Bet you never ask again
[This message has been edited by Vylare (edited 10-09-2001).]
<B> I took the Keirsey and found myself an Idealist (NF). I absolutely love mind numbing detail and psychology...any idea where to look for that info (without paying the Keirsey people a lotta money for a complete summary)?
-Nikelon
</B></font><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Boy, will you be sorry you asked
OK...Idealists can be INFPs, ENFPs, INFJs, ENFJs. Link to a description of these types:
http://keirsey.com/personality/nf.html
I'm an INFP myself
You used to be able to get your complete Keirsey results online; I see they are now charging. You can probably get their book - Please Understand Me or Please Understand Me II-at the local library. It will have a whole test in it, but you'll have to score it yourself
The alt.psychology.personality archives has a ton of good info:
http://www.ibiblio.org/personality/
There are two tests that have the exact same 16 personality types as results, but they are not the same test.
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI to its friends) is trademarked and copyrighted by Consulting Psychological Press. I'm not aware of anywhere you can take the actual test for free, but there is one in the same style at http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes1.htm These are longer than the Keirsey Temperament Sorter, which is trademarked and copyrighted by David Keirsey. There is a .75 correlation between the two tests, meaning that 3 of 4 people who take both tests will have the same result on both.
These tests are based on Jungian personality theory, and I'm a Jungian kinda gal, so here's a link to Carl Jung's work: http://www.cgjungpage.org/
I'm also endlessly fascinated by the Journal of Mud Research: http://www.brandeis.edu/pubs/jove/
And one of its famous contributors, Richard Bartle, who wrote the article, Players Who Suit Muds, which caused Erwin Andreasen to create the mud personality test.
http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.htm
Bet you never ask again
[This message has been edited by Vylare (edited 10-09-2001).]
2 % fall into this category cripes im an eq hog :P! heh 93% achiever 46 % explorer 40 % killer 20 % socializer my type is AEK!
heh just took the kiersy test wanted to see what i was i'm an idealist heh (nf)
[This message has been edited by xa (edited 10-22-2001).]
[This message has been edited by xa (edited 10-23-2001).]
heh just took the kiersy test wanted to see what i was
i'm an idealist heh (nf)[This message has been edited by xa (edited 10-22-2001).]
[This message has been edited by xa (edited 10-23-2001).]
-
Baikalisan
- Sojourner
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2001 5:01 am
- Contact:
Return to “S3 General Discussion Archive”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests