An option for mucho XP characters?
An option for mucho XP characters?
Figured with the end of the year coming up, I had to toss another poll on the bbs so there's something to look at..The way I see it is a Grand Druid, such as Lilithelle, should have more hps than a druid who has just achieved level 50. Sure, eq should matter, but also so should base stats. Anyhoo, I'm curious is all
-
- Sojourner
- Posts: 1499
- Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2002 5:01 am
- Location: Virginia Beach
- Contact:
Disagree. If/when 2.0 goes in, it'd hose to many things up, and it'd drive people to keep exping like mad over 50 to get to that rollover point where you can't exp anymore for the extra hp. It could be way to twinky.
Shevarash OOC: 'what can I say, I'm attracted to crazy chicks and really short dudes'
You should be punished at the most severe levels for even thinking about getting people to do more exp in the current exp environment :P
Arishae group-says 'mah sunray brings all the boys to the yard'
Shadow Scream
Shadow Scream
O. M. G. ...
You want to unbalance Pava any more than she already is? Pava is ALREADY broken!!!
Lets see, 100+ damroll with rage on proc, haste on proc and 3x a day, vit on proc, major globe 1x day, invis unlimitedx day, full protects, (am i missing anything ross?), and now what, how many hps would you get for an xp buffer that is over 7000%???
You want to unbalance Pava any more than she already is? Pava is ALREADY broken!!!
Lets see, 100+ damroll with rage on proc, haste on proc and 3x a day, vit on proc, major globe 1x day, invis unlimitedx day, full protects, (am i missing anything ross?), and now what, how many hps would you get for an xp buffer that is over 7000%???
-
- Sojourner
- Posts: 765
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2002 5:01 am
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Corth wrote:The last thing we will ever need is a system that rewards obtaining exp perpetually. The horror!
Nod, RL is bad enough at that. :evil:
How to go from Waelos to Weylarii.
Weylarii group-says 'oh shit! my penis is stuck in the toaster. afk'
Corth ASSOC:: 'up to you.. need a ranger, but if you want to afk i can probably find someone else'
Weylarii group-says 'oh shit! my penis is stuck in the toaster. afk'
Corth ASSOC:: 'up to you.. need a ranger, but if you want to afk i can probably find someone else'
-
- Sojourner
- Posts: 7275
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2001 5:01 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA and Flagstaff, AZ
- Contact:
I played a mud where you could trade exp for stats... they called it a "meta" system.
There were "ranks" depending on how much "total stats" you had "metad". With 50 buys you might be a lord, 100 buys a prince, 200 buys a king ect ect ect... which was mildly entertaining.
It got boring fast and insane, a normal char started out around 400 hps, and one guy was up to 4k hps after about 3 years at 4 hps per "buy". Each buy had an incremental cost increase. Your first buy mightve cost 2 million exp but your 100th might've cost 100 million exp. If you cap something, then you'll end up in the same place today, lots of exp, nothing to do with it. If you uncap it, you have hardcore gamers doing insane stuff. Without character death, you can only adjust the rate at which they eventually do something insane.
Excessive competition and isolation for prime exp, because exp becomes the point.
A need to define and balance the "exp rate" and maintain consistency over time. This ultimately ends up in escalation so 20 hours of exp today is worth 18 hours next year 14 the next year and 5 the following year (ect) recreating all sorts of problems we've examined in the past.
Exploits / bugs / "features" that allow characters to amass unfair amounts of "exp benefit" translate directly into permanent advantages that don't have many limitations (yes even 1 hp at a time). Yes we have this with equipment, but equipment advantages tend to be limited by being able to equip / use only 1-2 at a time and the inherent limitations of ingame "wealth".
There were "ranks" depending on how much "total stats" you had "metad". With 50 buys you might be a lord, 100 buys a prince, 200 buys a king ect ect ect... which was mildly entertaining.
It got boring fast and insane, a normal char started out around 400 hps, and one guy was up to 4k hps after about 3 years at 4 hps per "buy". Each buy had an incremental cost increase. Your first buy mightve cost 2 million exp but your 100th might've cost 100 million exp. If you cap something, then you'll end up in the same place today, lots of exp, nothing to do with it. If you uncap it, you have hardcore gamers doing insane stuff. Without character death, you can only adjust the rate at which they eventually do something insane.
Excessive competition and isolation for prime exp, because exp becomes the point.
A need to define and balance the "exp rate" and maintain consistency over time. This ultimately ends up in escalation so 20 hours of exp today is worth 18 hours next year 14 the next year and 5 the following year (ect) recreating all sorts of problems we've examined in the past.
Exploits / bugs / "features" that allow characters to amass unfair amounts of "exp benefit" translate directly into permanent advantages that don't have many limitations (yes even 1 hp at a time). Yes we have this with equipment, but equipment advantages tend to be limited by being able to equip / use only 1-2 at a time and the inherent limitations of ingame "wealth".
Sarell wrote:You should be punished at the most severe levels for even thinking about getting people to do more exp in the current exp environment :P
Agreed, because . . .
kiryan wrote:If you uncap it, you have hardcore gamers doing insane stuff.
Also, I agree with Gormal's ESCALATE! reference.
Yotus group-says 'special quest if you type hi dragon'
Shevarash OOC: 'I feature only the finest mammary glands.'
Silena group-says 'he was so fat and juicy..couldnt resist'
Shevarash OOC: 'I feature only the finest mammary glands.'
Silena group-says 'he was so fat and juicy..couldnt resist'
kiryan wrote:I played a mud where you could trade exp for stats... they called it a "meta" system.
There were "ranks" depending on how much "total stats" you had "metad". With 50 buys you might be a lord, 100 buys a prince, 200 buys a king ect ect ect... which was mildly entertaining.
It got boring fast and insane, a normal char started out around 400 hps, and one guy was up to 4k hps after about 3 years at 4 hps per "buy". Each buy had an incremental cost increase. Your first buy mightve cost 2 million exp but your 100th might've cost 100 million exp. If you cap something, then you'll end up in the same place today, lots of exp, nothing to do with it. If you uncap it, you have hardcore gamers doing insane stuff. Without character death, you can only adjust the rate at which they eventually do something insane.
Excessive competition and isolation for prime exp, because exp becomes the point.
A need to define and balance the "exp rate" and maintain consistency over time. This ultimately ends up in escalation so 20 hours of exp today is worth 18 hours next year 14 the next year and 5 the following year (ect) recreating all sorts of problems we've examined in the past.
Exploits / bugs / "features" that allow characters to amass unfair amounts of "exp benefit" translate directly into permanent advantages that don't have many limitations (yes even 1 hp at a time). Yes we have this with equipment, but equipment advantages tend to be limited by being able to equip / use only 1-2 at a time and the inherent limitations of ingame "wealth".
wtf mike you played imperial diku? I was in 3.0 I think as Lyniara.
It will be fixed in Toril 2.0.
Aremat group-says 'tanks i highly suggest investing 20 silver in training weapons from cm to cut down on the losing scales to shield'
Aremat group-says 'tanks i highly suggest investing 20 silver in training weapons from cm to cut down on the losing scales to shield'
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests