Who command

[Todrael]

1) Remove who zone, thief, outlaws, sorcerer, assassin, berserker, monk, mercenary, pkill,
2) Add who rp,
3) Re-implement who anonymous.

-Todrael

[Iaiken Toransier]

But they are ANONYMOUS!!!

HOW CAN THAT BE???

< 338h/338H 140v/140V> Who anonymous
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[ Anon ] That Guy (Dunno) (RP)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
< 338h/338H 140v/140V> Doh!!!
Pardon???
< 338h/338H 140v/140V>

Oh, simple things...

[Zoldren]

if they were truely anon then we wouldnt be able to see them walking around the game. or for that matter posting on bbs. The would not exist to us for they are anon ie hidden.

anon does what it should only hides, lvls and class, let people keep that, but make it available via who, there for they still exist but have their secrecy

[Gort]

Down w/ anon, just tog tells :P


Toplack

[Guest]

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR><font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Todrael:
<B>1) Remove who zone, thief, outlaws, sorcerer, assassin, berserker, monk, mercenary, pkill,
</B></font><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

we have valid reasons for not doing any of the above, including the fact that some of these options serve quite useful purposes.

who rp is an interesting idea tho. I'll see that it gets added to The List.

--D2

[Elseenas]

Things like "who zone" no doubt serve a useful purpose, but still should return an error message for us.

What is the reasoning, if I may ask, on not letting who anon work for morts?

If you let us know maybe we can stop pestering you about it

------------------

Elseenas of No House Worth Mentioning

[Garad]

Yes, add "who anon". I like that idea very much. Always wanted such command.

------------------
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain.
- Lily Tomlin
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*